| |
|
| For
previous messages, browse the archive |
You Are
Here: Management Updates
2007 Archive
June 8, 2007
Date: June 8, 2007
Category: Insects
Subject: Annual Bluegrass (Hyperodes) Weevil
Well, the action has picked up considerably in just the past week! We
are hearing of significant annual bluegrass weevil populations - and
damage - on golf courses in southeastern Pennsylvania and southern New
Jersey. In those areas, the worst should be over for now, as most individuals
should have completed the larval stages and are now pupating.
In Westchester County, New York, samples collected on Monday (4 June) were
75% large larvae, less than 5% pupae, and the rest were small or medium larvae.
Samples pulled just south of Hartford on Wednesday (6 June) were 20% small
larvae, 40% medium larvae, and 40% large larvae.
Paul Heller (turf entomologist at Penn State) and I have seen the same phenomenon
in several locations this year. Regular sampling in early spring did not uncover
many adults, and we wondered whether the populations would be a little lower
than "normal" this year. Even as recently as a week ago, sampling in some sites
indicated that most populations were still small larvae, and yet when we collected
samples this week, all of a sudden the populations had progressed to large
larvae. Neither of us can remember such rapid "explosions" of activity in the
past 10 to 15 years. And populations are higher in most locations than we have
seen in several years. Each of us has visited at least one site where there
are more than 220 larvae per square foot in untreated plots.
Meanwhile annual bluegrass populations seem to be higher than "normal" in several
locations, as well. At least there are more seedheads...
For golf course superintendents who are wrestling with ABW damage, here is
a quick reminder of your options. The first step is to collect several samples
from the areas where the weevils are active, and determine whether most of
the insects are larva (they look like grains of rice with brown heads, pupa
(cream-colored and kind of diamond-shaped), or adults.
If the insects are mostly larvae, you can get relief by applying
trichlorfon (Dylox™). (We have also had good success several years with
spinosad, Conserve™, but those trials have been directed against small
and medium larvae in the spring, so we don't really know whether Conserve™ can
be effective against full-grown larvae.) Dylox™ should provide about
50 to 75% control of the larvae that are present when you treat. Check the
label, because while ABW larvae were added to the Dylox™ label a couple
years ago, there may be a couple formulations that do not include ABW.
If the insects are mostly adults™, you should consider using one of the
pyrethroids. Bifenthrin (Talstar™), cyfluthrin (Tempo™), lambda-cyhalothrin
(Battle™, Scimitar™), and deltamethrin (DeltaGard™) are among
the more commonly used materials. Note that there are several additional products
with the same active ingredient but different trade names. For those of you
who are concerned about the possibility of the development of resistance, you
can also get good control of adults with chlorpyrifos (Dursban), an organophosphate.
If the insects are mostly pupae, you should wait a week or
ten days and then apply a pyrethroid, targeting the newly emerging adults.
In all cases, follow with a little water - one pass of the irrigation heads
if you have good pressure, two passes if you have marginal pressure or it is
a windy day (of course, if it is that windy, you probably shouldn't be spraying!).
In the case of the pyrethroids, that is enough water to knock the material
off the blades and into the thatch. Note that some of the manufacturers do
not believe that post-application water on pyrethroids is necessary ... but
personally, I prefer to see the applications watered in lightly.
Submitted
by: Dr.
Pat Vittum
DISCLAIMER -
As always, it is the responsibility of the applicator to verify the
registration status of any pesticide BEFORE applying
it. Different states have different regulations as well. The author
and the University of Massachusetts are not liable for any consequences
of any pesticide "recommendations". Mention of any trade
name is not to be considered endorsement of a product. |
|