|
|
|
|
<
Disclaimer
> |
||||||
You Are
Here: Management Updates
Date: June 10, 2008 Maximizing turfgrass disease control by understanding spray
volume and the topical mode of action of fungicides Managing lower stem, crown and root infecting diseases, such as anthracnose basal rot is particularly difficult; because the fungicide applied must be able reach all susceptible plant parts. Therefore, a higher spray volume (3-4 gallons/1000 sq ft) for systemic fungicides will allow for better control by allowing the fungicide to be placed deeper in the root-zone and thatch, where the pathogen will attack. Also, all systemic fungicides except for fosetyl-Al, only move upward, which means that the point of initial absorption is critical to provide adequate control. However, a lower spray volume is recommended for fosetyl-Al (Chipco Signature™) since it is the only true systemic fungicide with up and down movement from the point of absorption. On the other hand, when managing foliar diseases, such as dollar spot, utilizing a lower spray volume (1-2 gallons/1000 sq ft) for both contact and systemic fungicides will provide the best control. A lower spray volume will maximize the fungicide on the target area without diluting the fungicide. In particular, contact fungicides are a significant part of fungicide
resistance management due to their multi-site mode of action in fungi.
This greatly reduces the risk of resistance development by reducing some
systemic fungicide applications. Systemic fungicides can give longer
disease control, but are more susceptible to fungicide resistance. This
is due to their inhibition of only one biosynthesis pathway (single-site
mode of action). By avoiding repeat applications of the same single-site
mode of action systemic fungicides, fungicide resistance can be managed
more effectively. As a result, single-site systemic fungicides can be
used for a longer period of time. Also, different fungicide trade names
do not correlate to different modes of action, so check the label for
active ingredient (a.i.) and refer to the FRAC codes to make sure you
are rotating your chemicals properly. For information on current fungicides,
the diseases they control, and FRAC codes refer to our current Turf
Fungicide Chart If you are suspicious about lack or failure of chemical control, please
send your samples to the UMass Extension Plant Diagnostic Lab. Complete
instructions for submitting samples to the lab are available at: http://www.umass.edu/agland/diagnostics Submitted by: Dr. Geunhwa Jung DISCLAIMER - As always, it is the responsibility of the applicator to verify the registration status of any pesticide BEFORE applying it. Different states have different regulations as well. The author and the University of Massachusetts are not liable for any consequences of any pesticide "recommendations". Mention of any trade name is not to be considered endorsement of a product. |
||||||
|
Links
followed by the |
||||||
If
you are experiencing problems with this site, please contact
the webmaster.
|